This page provides a preliminary summary
on the following items for Romania:
- Spatial planning
- Environment
- Nature Conservation
- Sectoral Development
- Framework for Development of ICZM
- National Achievements in the Field of ICZM
- Problems and Constraints for the Development of ICZM
1. Spatial Planning
1.1 Legislation and Regulations
- The Law of Landfund (no. 18/1991)
1.2 Administrative competencies
The Ministry of Public Works and Territorial
Management is the highest organ at the national level. [29]
1.3 Coastal Policy
No information received.
2. Environment
2.1 Legislation and Regulations
- The Environmental Protection Law, (no. 137/1995).
- The Water Law, (no. 8/1974).
- Law no. 17/1990; the Law contains the juridical organisation
of Romania inner waters, territorial waters and the
contiguous zone.
- Government Decision no. 1001/1990; establishes a
unitary payment system for water management products
and services regarding the quantitative protection of
waters.
- Government Decision no. 196/1991, aiming at implementing
the national strategy in the field of water management.
[30]
2.2 Administrative Competencies
The ministry of Waters, Forests, and Environmental
Protection represents the Central Environmental Authority
(CEA), a central specialised body of the administrative
power. The ministry has specific competencies regarding
the improvement of environmental factors, water management
and nuclear activity monitoring.
The Ministry of Waters, Forests and Environmental Protection
has in its subordination territorial Environment Protection
Agencies and four Advisory committees. [31]
2.3 Environmental Policy
- Preparation of a new standard related to: pollution
control, quality of coastal waters, quality of fresh
water, including sources of potable water and littoral
lakes.
3. Nature Conservation
3.1 Legislation and Regulations
- Law for the Protection of Natural Monuments, (no.
213/1930).
- Governmental Decree no. 237/1950 regarding the protection
of natural monuments of the Romanian Popular Republic.
- Environmental Protection Law, (no. 137/1995).
- Law no. 17/1990; contains regulations special provisions
concerning the prevention, reducing and keeping under
control the marine environment pollution. [32]
- Law no. 2/1987; concerning maintenance, protection
and development of forests.
- Law no. 81/1993; stipulates compensation fixing for
damages brought of forestry fund, forestry vegetation
on the private or public estate and hunting economy.
- Law no. 8/1991; ratification of the Convention on
long distance transboundary air pollution. [33]
Policies:
- Policy: Establishing a regional co-ordinating body
related to protected areas, valuable habitats and historical
and geological sites.
3.2 Administrative Competencies
- Central authority: The Ministry of Waters, Forests,
and Environmental Protection (MWFEP) represents the
Central Environmental Authority (CEA), a central specialised
body of the administrative power. The ministry has specific
competencies regarding to promoting and developing measures
aiming at the protection and conservation of natural
resources and at their rational management according
to the requirements of improving environmental quality,
of maintaining the biological diversity and ecological
equilibrium.
- Local authority: The Environmental Protection Agencies,
which are directly subordinated to the ministry (MWFEP).
[34]
3.3 System of Protected Areas
The need of protection in some specific areas
of the Dobrogea region has been imposed since 1939, when
a natural reserve was established in the Agigea locality.
Later the problems of protecting nature were extended and
diversified within four specific categories: florist, faunistic,
geologic and complex reserves. The protected areas in Dobrogea
are categorised as 19 scientific reserves, 7 natural monuments,
11 natural reserves, 1 landscape reserve and the Danube
Delta Biosphere Reserve. On the whole the surface of the
natural areas which are protected cover 48% of Dobrogea.
More than 60 % of the total protected areas in the coastal
zone of Romania is situated in Tulcea county. [35]
4. Sectoral Development
4.1 Coastal Defence
Over 70 % of the littoral length are affected
by erosion. In the last 30 years the shoreline belonging
to the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve took back with 300
meters and the beaches lost 80 ha/year. Another negative
aspect for this sector is referring to the constructions
build near the shoreline or even on the beach. It is obvious
that there is a need for some regulations in this field.
4.2 Recreation and Tourism
In the tourist industry, which might be a
very profitable field both for the country economy as for
the local population, a decrease in number of Romanian and
especially foreign tourists has been registered. Statistics
show us that in 1992 there were 106.600 foreign tourists
and in 1995 there were only 68.400 foreign tourists. The
use of accommodation capacity is also at a very low level,
in Constanta county 54 % is used and in Tulcea county only
23 % is used. There are also negative aspects in insufficient
capitalisation and effectiveness of the potential tourist
value. Also a lack of good transport to the coast and the
Danube-Delta.
4.3 Fisheries and Aquaculture
There are significant negative aspects in
marine biodiversity, such as a drastic decrease of several
marine organisms, partly due to the appearance of new opportunistic
species in the Black Sea. Ecological changes were reflected
in the commercial catches. In the 1960 s, 26 commercial
fish species were caught and nowadays this number has declined
to 5 species. [36]
4.4 Transport
Transport in Dobrogea is represented by maritime,
river, car, railway and air transport. The initial connections
for foreign trade is still by maritime transport. River
transport is mainly progressing on the Danube between localities
such as Ostrov, Macin, Isaccea and Sulina. The section between
Tulcea and Sulina is part of the international river transport
system. Ships sail only during daytime and ores, oil and
timber are usually being transported. And of course there
is the 65 km long Danube - Black Sea Channel. The use of
the canal shortens the sailing in the Danube with at least
300 km.
Dobrogea is has more than 3500 km of roads, of which 2000
km has been modernised. Constanta is first with the modernisation
of its roads.
Railway transport is first represented by the Constanta
- Cernavoda thoroughfare rail network. This a connection
with the central part of the country and allows transport
of 65 goods trains about 20 travellers trains. The second
rail network connects Tulcea county with the rest of the
country. A third network locally connects the region. The
total railroad length is 68 km in Tulcea county and 392
km in Constanta county (1994).
Two airports exist in the region, in Tulcea and in Constanta,
the latter being an international airport. Generally, in
winter, the flights are only to Bucharest and in the summer
there are more internal flights and also external flights.
4.5 Harbours and Shipping
An important part of the Romanian trade takes
place by marine transport. In the area there are four main
harbours: Constanta, Mangalia, Midia and Sulina. The traffic
in Constanta harbour increased rapidly the last decades
from 14.5 million tons in 1970 to 45 million tons in 1980.
Simultaneously, the traffic structure changed, reaching
a growth of imports of up to 65% and a structure diversification.
The export is about 35% of the total harbour traffic and
60 % of the country’s export are carried out through this
port. The port is increasingly used by other countries,
many cargo agencies running their business in the port.
Midia harbour is used for oil traffic and Mangalia harbour
for different goods and ore traffic. Sulina harbour has
the statute of a free port, specialised in heavy goods traffic.
[37]
4.6 Industry
In industry the decrease of total industrial
production as well as the increase of unemployment are evident.
For instance the total industrial production in 1995 was
only 60 % from the production of 1989. These are figures
for the Constanta county, which is the best industrialised
of the two coastal zone counties.
4.7 Agriculture
In the agricultural sector a decrease has
been registered in the total agricultural production, although
in this field there is the best and most extended irrigation
system. In 1994 the total agricultural represented 56.3%
from the value of the 1990 production. Another problem persisting
in agriculture is the uncontrolled irrigation leading to
an increase of humidity in some soils and subsequently,
to an increase of salt in them.
5. Framework for Development of ICZM
A number of documents that relate to the implementation
of ICZM, have been signed by Romania and were adopted at
international and regional level. The main ones are the
Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Environment and Development
with its ‘Agenda 21’(1992), The Bucharest Convention (1992),
The Odessa Ministerial Declaration (1993) and the Black
Sea Strategic Action Plan (BS SAP) (1996). The United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Seas, MARPOL, the ECE Convention,
the Danube Convention and the Ramsar Convention have been
signed and ratified as well. The basic decision to introduce
the ICZM process in the Black Sea coastal zones has been
adopted by the Odessa Declaration. This decision has been
further elaborated in the BS SAP. The National ICZM Report
and the National ICZM Policies and Strategies Report have
both been written as well.
6. National Achievements in the Field
of ICZM
- The concept, methodology, tools and techniques of
ICZM, as well as potential benefits of its implementation
were presented, disseminated at governmental and some
local levels. Some initial activities implemented successfully,
a number of experts and institutions being involved.
Thus more meetings were organised to discuss specific
ICZM aspects. Furthermore, a technical seminar was organised
to train the selected consultants related to ICZM pilot
projects and their implementation.
- A National ICZM Network, as the major tool for achieving
co-ordination and integration of the coastal zone related
decision making process, was established and its tasks
and activities defined; the preparation and implementation
of National ICZM Pilot Projects and the definition of
the National ICZM Strategies and Policies.
- The national coastal zone boundaries were defined
on the base of a multisectoral analysis.
- A National Report was prepared, presenting the actual
situation, problems and causes as well as prioritising
the critical issues and presenting lists of priority
actions and investments. The World Bank (WB) revised
all of this.
- An ICZM Pilot Project entitled ‘ICZM and Investment
Plan for Constanta County’ was prepared, approved by
the Romania Government and the World Bank. The Project
is not implemented yet and is waiting for further development
of the BSEP or other opportunities. [38]
- Law related to land use has been created and approved.
This law created a new legal framework to apply the
land use planning system.
- Special methodologies (approved) by which the impact
of socio-economic activities is assessed, have been
created.
- Creation of new pollution (wastewater) and quality
and quantity (coastal water) indicators.
- An inter-ministerial commission named ‘LÏTORAL’
was established by governmental decision, having the
role of the ICZM network.
- A National Contingency Plan was established and improved.
In short time the government will approve it. [39]
7. Problems and Constraints for the Development of
ICZM
- Existing national legislation is incomplete related
to sustainable development. There is an absence of ICZM
Law or an appropriate act.
- National legislation and development policies still
don’t give a certain priority to the coastal zone.
- Absence of adequate institutional arrangements for
the coastal protection against erosion, for protection
of special areas, except for the Danube Delta.
- Insufficient institutional and human capacities to
introduce and implement the ICZM process, including
the lack of experience in practical ICZM projects. Also
insufficient participation of the public, NGO’s and
the scientific community to improve the environment.
- Lack of funds for: efficient pollution monitoring
and control; establishing of needed institutional ICZM
related arrangements; implementation of pilot projects,
training and capacity building programmes; protection
against erosion and ICZM related research.
- Insufficient international financial and technical
assistance. [40]
References
| 29 |
Institutional structure related to the protection
of coastal environment and management to coastal resources
(in Romania). |
| 30 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
| 31 |
Institutional structure related to the protection
of coastal environment and management to coastal resources
(in Romania). |
| 32 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
| 33 |
Institutional structure related to the protection
of coastal environment and management to coastal resources
(in Romania). |
| 34 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
| 35 |
information provided by Luminata Buga. |
| 36 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
| 37 |
information provided by Luminata Buga. |
| 38 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
| 39 |
‘Report of the meeting of ICZM co-ordinators’, Gelendzhik,
Russia, 1999. |
| 40 |
GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies:
Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997. |
Prepared by Martijn Onderstal at EUCC International
Secretariat