Policy
 

 
This section includes
 
Black Sea
Bulgaria
Georgia
Romania
Russia
Turkey
Ukraine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) in Europe
 
Coastal Management in Romania
 

This page provides a preliminary summary on the following items for Romania:

  • Spatial planning
  • Environment
  • Nature Conservation
  • Sectoral Development
  • Framework for Development of ICZM
  • National Achievements in the Field of ICZM
  • Problems and Constraints for the Development of ICZM

 

1. Spatial Planning
 

1.1 Legislation and Regulations

  • The Law of Landfund (no. 18/1991)
1.2 Administrative competencies

The Ministry of Public Works and Territorial Management is the highest organ at the national level. [29]

1.3 Coastal Policy

No information received.
 
 

2. Environment
 

2.1 Legislation and Regulations

  • The Environmental Protection Law, (no. 137/1995).
  • The Water Law, (no. 8/1974).
  • Law no. 17/1990; the Law contains the juridical organisation of Romania inner waters, territorial waters and the contiguous zone.
  • Government Decision no. 1001/1990; establishes a unitary payment system for water management products and services regarding the quantitative protection of waters.
  • Government Decision no. 196/1991, aiming at implementing the national strategy in the field of water management. [30]
2.2 Administrative Competencies

The ministry of Waters, Forests, and Environmental Protection represents the Central Environmental Authority (CEA), a central specialised body of the administrative power. The ministry has specific competencies regarding the improvement of environmental factors, water management and nuclear activity monitoring.
The Ministry of Waters, Forests and Environmental Protection has in its subordination territorial Environment Protection Agencies and four Advisory committees. [31]

2.3 Environmental Policy

  • Preparation of a new standard related to: pollution control, quality of coastal waters, quality of fresh water, including sources of potable water and littoral lakes.

3. Nature Conservation
 

3.1 Legislation and Regulations

  • Law for the Protection of Natural Monuments, (no. 213/1930).
  • Governmental Decree no. 237/1950 regarding the protection of natural monuments of the Romanian Popular Republic.
  • Environmental Protection Law, (no. 137/1995).
  • Law no. 17/1990; contains regulations special provisions concerning the prevention, reducing and keeping under control the marine environment pollution. [32]
  • Law no. 2/1987; concerning maintenance, protection and development of forests.
  • Law no. 81/1993; stipulates compensation fixing for damages brought of forestry fund, forestry vegetation on the private or public estate and hunting economy.
  • Law no. 8/1991; ratification of the Convention on long distance transboundary air pollution. [33]
Policies:
  • Policy: Establishing a regional co-ordinating body related to protected areas, valuable habitats and historical and geological sites.
3.2 Administrative Competencies
  • Central authority: The Ministry of Waters, Forests, and Environmental Protection (MWFEP) represents the Central Environmental Authority (CEA), a central specialised body of the administrative power. The ministry has specific competencies regarding to promoting and developing measures aiming at the protection and conservation of natural resources and at their rational management according to the requirements of improving environmental quality, of maintaining the biological diversity and ecological equilibrium.
  • Local authority: The Environmental Protection Agencies, which are directly subordinated to the ministry (MWFEP). [34]
3.3 System of Protected Areas

The need of protection in some specific areas of the Dobrogea region has been imposed since 1939, when a natural reserve was established in the Agigea locality. Later the problems of protecting nature were extended and diversified within four specific categories: florist, faunistic, geologic and complex reserves. The protected areas in Dobrogea are categorised as 19 scientific reserves, 7 natural monuments, 11 natural reserves, 1 landscape reserve and the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. On the whole the surface of the natural areas which are protected cover 48% of Dobrogea. More than 60 % of the total protected areas in the coastal zone of Romania is situated in Tulcea county. [35]
 
 

4. Sectoral Development
 

4.1 Coastal Defence

Over 70 % of the littoral length are affected by erosion. In the last 30 years the shoreline belonging to the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve took back with 300 meters and the beaches lost 80 ha/year. Another negative aspect for this sector is referring to the constructions build near the shoreline or even on the beach. It is obvious that there is a need for some regulations in this field.

4.2 Recreation and Tourism

In the tourist industry, which might be a very profitable field both for the country economy as for the local population, a decrease in number of Romanian and especially foreign tourists has been registered. Statistics show us that in 1992 there were 106.600 foreign tourists and in 1995 there were only 68.400 foreign tourists. The use of accommodation capacity is also at a very low level, in Constanta county 54 % is used and in Tulcea county only 23 % is used. There are also negative aspects in insufficient capitalisation and effectiveness of the potential tourist value. Also a lack of good transport to the coast and the Danube-Delta.

4.3 Fisheries and Aquaculture

There are significant negative aspects in marine biodiversity, such as a drastic decrease of several marine organisms, partly due to the appearance of new opportunistic species in the Black Sea. Ecological changes were reflected in the commercial catches. In the 1960 s, 26 commercial fish species were caught and nowadays this number has declined to 5 species. [36]

4.4 Transport

Transport in Dobrogea is represented by maritime, river, car, railway and air transport. The initial connections for foreign trade is still by maritime transport. River transport is mainly progressing on the Danube between localities such as Ostrov, Macin, Isaccea and Sulina. The section between Tulcea and Sulina is part of the international river transport system. Ships sail only during daytime and ores, oil and timber are usually being transported. And of course there is the 65 km long Danube - Black Sea Channel. The use of the canal shortens the sailing in the Danube with at least 300 km.
Dobrogea is has more than 3500 km of roads, of which 2000 km has been modernised. Constanta is first with the modernisation of its roads.
Railway transport is first represented by the Constanta - Cernavoda thoroughfare rail network. This a connection with the central part of the country and allows transport of 65 goods trains about 20 travellers trains. The second rail network connects Tulcea county with the rest of the country. A third network locally connects the region. The total railroad length is 68 km in Tulcea county and 392 km in Constanta county (1994).
Two airports exist in the region, in Tulcea and in Constanta, the latter being an international airport. Generally, in winter, the flights are only to Bucharest and in the summer there are more internal flights and also external flights.

4.5 Harbours and Shipping

An important part of the Romanian trade takes place by marine transport. In the area there are four main harbours: Constanta, Mangalia, Midia and Sulina. The traffic in Constanta harbour increased rapidly the last decades from 14.5 million tons in 1970 to 45 million tons in 1980. Simultaneously, the traffic structure changed, reaching a growth of imports of up to 65% and a structure diversification. The export is about 35% of the total harbour traffic and 60 % of the country’s export are carried out through this port. The port is increasingly used by other countries, many cargo agencies running their business in the port. Midia harbour is used for oil traffic and Mangalia harbour for different goods and ore traffic. Sulina harbour has the statute of a free port, specialised in heavy goods traffic. [37]

4.6 Industry

In industry the decrease of total industrial production as well as the increase of unemployment are evident. For instance the total industrial production in 1995 was only 60 % from the production of 1989. These are figures for the Constanta county, which is the best industrialised of the two coastal zone counties.

4.7 Agriculture

In the agricultural sector a decrease has been registered in the total agricultural production, although in this field there is the best and most extended irrigation system. In 1994 the total agricultural represented 56.3% from the value of the 1990 production. Another problem persisting in agriculture is the uncontrolled irrigation leading to an increase of humidity in some soils and subsequently, to an increase of salt in them.

5. Framework for Development of ICZM
 

A number of documents that relate to the implementation of ICZM, have been signed by Romania and were adopted at international and regional level. The main ones are the Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Environment and Development with its ‘Agenda 21’(1992), The Bucharest Convention (1992), The Odessa Ministerial Declaration (1993) and the Black Sea Strategic Action Plan (BS SAP) (1996). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas, MARPOL, the ECE Convention, the Danube Convention and the Ramsar Convention have been signed and ratified as well. The basic decision to introduce the ICZM process in the Black Sea coastal zones has been adopted by the Odessa Declaration. This decision has been further elaborated in the BS SAP. The National ICZM Report and the National ICZM Policies and Strategies Report have both been written as well.
 
 

6. National Achievements in the Field of ICZM
 

  • The concept, methodology, tools and techniques of ICZM, as well as potential benefits of its implementation were presented, disseminated at governmental and some local levels. Some initial activities implemented successfully, a number of experts and institutions being involved. Thus more meetings were organised to discuss specific ICZM aspects. Furthermore, a technical seminar was organised to train the selected consultants related to ICZM pilot projects and their implementation.
  • A National ICZM Network, as the major tool for achieving co-ordination and integration of the coastal zone related decision making process, was established and its tasks and activities defined; the preparation and implementation of National ICZM Pilot Projects and the definition of the National ICZM Strategies and Policies.
  • The national coastal zone boundaries were defined on the base of a multisectoral analysis.
  • A National Report was prepared, presenting the actual situation, problems and causes as well as prioritising the critical issues and presenting lists of priority actions and investments. The World Bank (WB) revised all of this.
  • An ICZM Pilot Project entitled ‘ICZM and Investment Plan for Constanta County’ was prepared, approved by the Romania Government and the World Bank. The Project is not implemented yet and is waiting for further development of the BSEP or other opportunities. [38]
  • Law related to land use has been created and approved. This law created a new legal framework to apply the land use planning system.
  • Special methodologies (approved) by which the impact of socio-economic activities is assessed, have been created.
  • Creation of new pollution (wastewater) and quality and quantity (coastal water) indicators.
  • An inter-ministerial commission named ‘LÏTORAL’ was established by governmental decision, having the role of the ICZM network.
  • A National Contingency Plan was established and improved. In short time the government will approve it. [39]

7. Problems and Constraints for the Development of ICZM

  • Existing national legislation is incomplete related to sustainable development. There is an absence of ICZM Law or an appropriate act.
  • National legislation and development policies still don’t give a certain priority to the coastal zone.
  • Absence of adequate institutional arrangements for the coastal protection against erosion, for protection of special areas, except for the Danube Delta.
  • Insufficient institutional and human capacities to introduce and implement the ICZM process, including the lack of experience in practical ICZM projects. Also insufficient participation of the public, NGO’s and the scientific community to improve the environment.
  • Lack of funds for: efficient pollution monitoring and control; establishing of needed institutional ICZM related arrangements; implementation of pilot projects, training and capacity building programmes; protection against erosion and ICZM related research.
  • Insufficient international financial and technical assistance. [40]

 

References
 

29 Institutional structure related to the protection of coastal environment and management to coastal resources (in Romania).
30 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.
31 Institutional structure related to the protection of coastal environment and management to coastal resources (in Romania).
32 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.
33 Institutional structure related to the protection of coastal environment and management to coastal resources (in Romania).
34 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.
35 information provided by Luminata Buga.
36 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.
37 information provided by Luminata Buga.
38 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.
39 ‘Report of the meeting of ICZM co-ordinators’, Gelendzhik, Russia, 1999.
40 GEF BSEP: ‘National ICZM Policies and Strategies: Romania’, Constanta, Romania, 1997.

 
 

 


 

Prepared by Martijn Onderstal at EUCC International Secretariat

© EUCC, 2000