VII. ENERGY
7.1. Status and Trends
The dominant fuel used in countries of the European Union is
oil. Solid fuels (coal, lignite) are most prevalent in central
Europe, and the former Soviet states are primarily dependent upon
gas and oil (Stanners & Bourdeau
1995). The rate of growth in the use of nuclear power
has slowed (Ibid). There
are around 200 nuclear power plants operating in Europe, many
of which are located in coastal regions or along rivers.
Nordic countries are the leaders in the use of renewable energy
sources. Iceland, for example, obtains nearly a third of its electricity
from geothermal sources, and more than a third from hydropower.
Denmark's success with windpower is well documented, and Norway
gets virtually all of its electricity from hydropower (Ibid).
Over the long term, an increase in the use of renewable energy
sources looks very promising ? economically as well as environmentally.
According to one recent study, "the prospects are excellent that
a wide range of new renewable energy technologies will become
fully competitive with conventional sources of energy during the
next several decades." (Johansson 1993) The rate at which
renewables become competitive, however, will largely depend upon
the extent to which they are supported by subsidies and tax incentives,
as conventional sources currently enjoy. Certainly the adoption
of full cost accounting procedures for conventional sources of
energy (as recommended by the OECD among others) would make
renewables more attractive by comparison.
In the shorter term, however, conventional sources of energy
will continue to be exploited as renewables gain momentum. In
all regions of Europe, the use of natural gas is on the rise (Stanners
& Bourdeau 1995). It is projected that gas production
in Europe will decline slowly, with two thirds of the current
potential supply depleted by 2050 (Johansson 1993).
7.2. Impacts
Mining and drilling, power generation and fuel storage, refining,
transport and use all have major impacts on environmental quality.
Power stations fuelled by conventional sources are often sited
in coastal areas due to their extensive water requirements for
cooling and/or fuel supply.
Specific impacts of conventional energy production include water
pollution (oil, thermal, radioactive discharges), air pollution
(CO2, NOx, SO2), land subsidence, and damage to habitats through
the construction of access roads, use of heavy equipment, drilling
and mining, all of which are harmful to biodiversity and landscapes
in coastal regions. More serious damage may occur from accidents
such as blowouts (oil and gas drilling), oil tanker accidents,
or nuclear catastrophes. Conventional energy installations also
occupy significant space in land-scarce coastal areas.
The nuclear industry poses a special threat to coastal and marine
ecosystems due to the sheer scale of damage that is likely to
result from a major nuclear accident. Nuclear power plants are
frequently located in coastal areas or near rivers due to the
large volume of cooling water needed, and radioactive wastes are
regularly transported across European seas for reprocessing in
France, England and Scotland. Even in the absence of major accidents,
coastal and marine ecosystems are threatened by operational discharges
of radioactive waste.
Global climate change also represents a major threat to coastal
and marine regions over the long term. The most prevalent greenhouse
gas is carbon dioxide (CO2), with emissions arising from both
natural and man-made sources. Of man-made sources, the burning
of fossil fuels is the greatest source of emissions. According
to the 1995 Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), global sea level has risen 10-25 cm over the last
100 years, and may rise an additional 15-95 cm (with a best estimate
of 50 cm) by 2100. Even if the concentrations of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere were to stabilise by that time, sea level would
continue to rise at a similar rate beyond this date and long into
the future. It is also important to note that these estimates
refer to global averages; changes in regional sea levels may significantly
differ (IPPC 1995).
For these reasons, the development of renewable energy sources
is preferable to continued investment in conventional energy supplies.
However, renewables are not without their impacts, particularly
at the local level, and it is essential that prior to any large-scale
development, environmental impact assessments must be carried
out. It must be stressed, however, that in comparison with conventional
energy sources, these impacts are small (with the exception of
large-scale hydropower schemes) (Stanners
& Bourdeau 1995). In coastal areas, renewable energy
developments may cause changes in sediment transport and deposition
(tidal barrages) (English Nature
1993a), obstruction of migration routes (tidal barrages,
dams), disturbance and to some extent, mortality of bird (wind
power) and other impacts associated with all types of coastal
engineering works.
Of all renewable energy sources, wind power is considered to
be the most economically feasible for further development in Europe
generally. Windpower may be generated by a single turbine, or
by a group of turbines which together form a wind farm. The environmental
impacts of a wind farm are greater than those arising from a single
turbine (Aspinwall & Company
1994). Wind farms tend to require large amounts of land,
dictated by the needs for a minimum space between each turbine.
They also have aesthetic impacts and there is often concern about
noise disturbance.
Tidal power may also have significant impacts in nearby coastal
areas. Tidal barriers may result in changes to tidal volumes,
levels and velocities, which affect salinity, sediment transport
and deposition, with significant impacts in saltmarsh and intertidal
zones (Ibid).
7.3. Opportunities
Renewable energy sources, by reducing our reliance on non-renewable
energy supplies (such as oil and gas which contribute to global
climate change and air pollution) and avoiding the need to use
nuclear power, contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally
friendly means of energy production. They provide also a safer
alternative to nuclear power, avoiding the need for the use, storage,
transport, and/or disposal of dangerous radioactive materials.
Important opportunities to develop specific renewable energy
sources include:
- Solar: solar-generated heating is particularly attractive
in the sunnier regions of southern Europe. In very remote areas,
solar photo-voltaic plants are economically competitive (Johansson
!993).
- Wind: warm coastal areas may provide ideal conditions for
generating windpower due to high wind speeds at low altitudes
with low turbulence (Aspinwall
& Company 1994) and because seasonal and daily wind
patterns in coastal areas often coincide with the demand for
electricity (Johansson 1993).
- Wave: onshore facilities are probably most useful on a small-scale
in remote coastal areas. Offshore installations are not economically
feasible at present.
- Tidal: generating tidal power is only feasible in macrotidal
estuaries or inlets.
- Anaerobic digestion (sewage) for electricity generation:
sewage digestors are generally most viable in large urban sewage
plants, with the benefit of reducing sludge volume and improving
effluent quality (Aspinwal &
Company 1994).
- Bio-fuels: set-aside agricultural land is an attractive location
for producing biomass for fuel.
- Landfill gas: the exploitation of landfills for electricity
generation is generally feasible in cities and towns
Any strategy to increase the use of renewables will require close
co-ordination with other sectors, particularly agriculture and forestry
(biomass), transport (automobile design) and urban planning (landfill
gas, sewage digesters).
7.4. Guidelines for Energy Development in Coastal Areas
Energy Conservation
Utilising opportunities to save energy through conservation and
efficiency programmes is an essential element in reducing CO2
emissions. Such options should be thoroughly considered prior
to the construction of new energy facilities.
Air Pollution
Proposals for new energy facilities should include an audit of
their contribution to global warming and air quality problems.
Problematic emissions will be reduced if new plants run on the
cleanest possible fuels (natural gas, renewables), and those running
on dirty fuels (nuclear, coal, lignite, oil-shale and oil) are
phased out.
Applying strict emission standards for NOx, SO2, CO2 and methane
to all plants throughout Europe will also help reduce pollution
effects. Wherever possible, CO2 should be removed from fuel feedstocks.
Siting of Buildings and Infrastructure
Guidelines on the siting of buildings and infrastructure can
be found in the Chapter on "Urbanisation".
7.4.1. Conventional Energy Sources
Offshore oil and gas development
There are many environmental arguments in favour of a ban on
exploration for new sources of oil and gas, for reasons of climate
change or to protect ecologically sensitive areas such as the
Wadden Sea or the Baltic Sea. At a minimum, stringent environmental
impact assessments should be carried out prior to any new development,
and application of the precautionary principle would dictate that
offshore activities should not proceed if it cannot be shown that
they will not cause significant harm to coastal and marine ecosystems.
All of these arguments should be thoroughly considered before
deciding to open new areas for exploration and/or development.
Implementation of integrated Environmental Management Systems
will help industry meet increasingly stringent environmental standards
for existing operations.
Drilling muds and cuttings, particularly those which are oil-based,
and polluted production water should not be discharged to the
sea. Diesel oil-based muds should not be used anymore.
Alternative options for the disposal of decommissioned offshore
installations at sea are required.
(See the Chapter on "Transport", section on oil spills, for further
information related to oil development.)
Onshore Oil and Gas Exploration and Development
Techniques such as deviated and horizontal drilling can be used
to avoid impacts on sensitive natural areas.
Siltation from run-off waters and pollution from discharges and
drilling muds can be environmentally damaging and should be avoided.
Site restoration is more effective if during site preparation,
leaf litter, topsoil and subsoil are reserved.
As with offshore oil and gas development, an effective contingency
plan will help mitigate the impact of oil spills.
Nuclear power
Many safety issues are unresolved, and a number of existing plants
pose a serious risk to the environment (particularly the Chernobyl-type
reactors in Ignalina, Sosnovy Bor and on the Kola Peninsula).
Resolving these issues should be a precondition for the further
construction of new nuclear plants.
Radioactive Waste Disposal
Radioactive waste should not be disposed of in the marine or
coastal environment, or where it may otherwise affect these environments.
Rather, it should be concentrated and contained, preferably on
or near the site where it is generated, until safe, permanent
disposal techniques are developed.
7.4.2. Renewable Sources
Wind
Windpower should be developed where possible alongside or within
existing coastal developments (e.g. industrial sites, power stations,
harbours) or on agricultural lands, set back from the coastline.
Wind farms located in sensitive wildlife habitats, or on seaside
cliff or headland sites, where the highest concentration of birds
may be found, can have major effects on the wildlife. In addition,
they may be considered a nuisance near residential areas.
Once wind turbines have been installed, local authorities should
ensure their optimal function, for example by preventing the construction
of buildings or other tall structures in the surrounding area
which could reduce local wind speeds.
In especially sensitive areas, machines designed for noise reduction
can be employed. For example, turbines with two-speed operation
allow the use of the lower speed during quieter periods of low
wind, and the higher speed during noisier periods of high wind.
Solar energy
Solar energy should be developed as extensively as possible and
habitat and architecture should be planned to that effect.
Tidal Power
Tidal barriers provide both threats and opportunities for redistribution
and settlement of coastal sediments. New habitat can be created,
though a full understanding of the nature of the geomorphological
system is essential.
Tidal barrages should be equipped with fish passes for migratory
species.
Hydroelectric Power
New hydroelectric power stations can cause erosion of the shoreline
as sediment delivery to the coast is restricted. They may have
the greatest impact on virgin river systems in coastal drainage
areas. When siting hydroelectric stations areas which are sensitive
to such impacts should be avoided.
Hydroelectric dams can be equipped with fish ladders to allow
migrating fish to pass. Such fish passes should remain operable
even when river flow is low. Screening turbine intakes and outfalls
will help ensure reduced fish kill.
Reduction in sediment supply as a result of dams, for example,
not only reduces the ability of habitats such as sand dunes and
saltmarshes to continue to grow but may also reduce sediment availability
for beach nourishment. In turn this can, and often does, lead
to coastal erosion and can have severe impacts on coastal urbanisation
as is the case on the Nile Delta amongst a number of other important
deltas in the Mediterranean. Dams should be fitted with sediment
bypasses to prevent damage to coastal wetlands, especially in
river deltas.
Zero-flow regimes, where water diversion leaves dry stretches
of river, will result in major losses of plants and animals.
Biomass
Biomass plantations are less diverse than natural ecosystems.
Therefore, they should only be established on degraded or set-aside
agricultural lands. Equal amounts of set-aside land should preferably
be allowed to return to a natural state in order to promote biodiversity.
REFERENCES: Energy
- Coalition Clean Baltic, "An NGO Vision of an Agenda 21 for
the Baltic Sea Region", October, 1996.
- "Action Plan", European Regions for a Safe and Clean Coast
(draft)", June, 1996.
- SEAS AT RISK, "Final Declaration of the First European Seas
at Risk Conference" Copenhagen, 1994.
- Ackefors, H., and Grip, K., "The Swedish Model for Coastal
Zone Management", ISBN 91-620-4455-9 Report 4455, Swedish Environmental
Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden 1995.
- Aspinwall & Company, "Nature conservation guidelines
for renewable energy projects", ISBN 1 85716 136 X, English
Nature, 1994.
- Baltic Institute, Visions and Strategies around the Baltic
Sea 2010: Towards a Framework for Spatial Development in the
Baltic Sea Region, ISBN 91-630-3091-8, Group of Focal Points,
Denmark, November, 1994.
- Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, Helsinki
Commission, "HELCOM Handbook", October 1995.
- English Nature, Campaign for a Living Coast, "Estuary Management
Plans: A co-ordinator's guide", ISBN 1 85716 121 1, English
Nature, 1993.
- European Commission, "The prospective development of the
northern seaboard" ISBN 92-826-8828-3, Office for Official Publications
of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1995.
- European Commission, Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European
territorial development, ISBN 92-826-9099-7, Luxembourg, 1994.
- GESAMP (Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects
of Marine Pollution), Impact of oil and related chemicals and
wastes on the marine environment, GESAMP Reports and Studies
No. 50, IMO, London, 1993.
- Grenon, M. and Batisse, M., Futures for the Mediterranean
Basin – The Blue Plan, ISBN 0-19-823312-4, Oxford University
Press, 1989.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), "IPCC Second
Assessment Climate Change 1995", World Meteorological Organisation
and United Nations Environment Programme, 1995.
- Johansson, T., et al., Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels
and Electricity, ISBN 1-55963-139-2, Earthscan Publications
Ltd., London, 1993.
- Lazarus, Michael et al., "Towards a Fossil free Energy Future
- The Next Energy Transition, A Technical Analysis for Greenpeace
International", Stockholm Environment Institute - Boston Center,
April 1993.
- Ministerial Declaration of the Fourth International Conference
on the Protection of the North Sea, T/NSC/325, 9 June 1995.
- Rosemarin, A., "Baltic 21, Creating an Agenda 21 for the
Baltic Sea Region, Main Report", ISBN:91 88714 28 4, Stockholm
Environment Institute, 1996.
- Stanners, D, Bourdeau, P. Eds., Europe's Environment: The
Dobris Assessment, European Environment Agency, August, 1995.
- The European Renewable Energy Study: Prospects for Renewable
Energy in the European Community and Eastern Europe up to 2010
- Main Report.
- UNEP, Guidelines for Integrated Management of Coastal and
Marine Areas ? With Special Reference to the Mediterranean Basin.
UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 161. Split, Coratia,
PAP/RAC (MAP-UNEP), 1995.
- McMichael, A.J. et al, Climate Change and Human Health, World
Health Organization, 1996.
- Nature Conservancy Council (UK), "Nature Conservation Guidelines
for Onshore Oil and Gas Development", ISBN 0 86139 346 5, June,
1986.
- Department of the Environment, Welsh Office "Planning Policy
Guidance: Renewable Energy", PPG 22, February 1993.
- Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, "Action Plan on
Biological Diversity, Report 4567, ISBN 91-620-4567-9, Stockholm,
1996.